Apr 26

I’ve been thinking about ways to get a minimal-impact hosepipe going at Kate’s allotment. At present she has a reservoir in a water-butt that collects off the shed roof, and she dips a watering-can in there to pour on the veg patch. I figured if you could lift the water to say the height of the shed roof, it would be enough to simply siphon off water with a hose that would allow the whole allotment to be watered without returning to the reservoir. I figured the pump technology wouldn’t have to be very advanced, since it would have all day to pump the water up to the header tank.

Mark at work suggested a sealed tank with a hose trailing in the reservoir: as the sun heats it during the day, the air within expands, and bubbles out of the end of the hose. At night, as it contracts, it draws water up the hose into the higher tank. To draw off water, you would open a tap at the bottom of the tank and take the hose out of the reservoir.

I did some calculations. Using a daytime max. temperature of 10 celsius and night time minimum of 5 celsius, and an 80-litre bin, this machine would suck 1.5 litres a day to a maximum height of 1.7 metres.

I imagine Kate’s in the habit of pouring slightly more than that on her cabbages.


4 comments so far...

  • Stu Said on April 26th, 2005 at 22:09:

    You need a liquid-piston stirling engine. The middle one on this page would be cool: http://www.sunmachine.de/english/examples_1.html

    That’s pretty close to the one I’m intending to build - hopefully this summer.

  • Andy Said on April 27th, 2005 at 08:24:

    Does make you wonder if it’s worth the effort.

  • ScottJ Said on April 28th, 2005 at 17:24:

    Maybe I’m missing something, but instead of letting the water descend and collect at ground level, then trying to pump it back up whence it came, wouldn’t it make more sense to simply raise the collecting tank to the level of the roof eaves and then water directly from that tank?

  • sweavo Said on April 28th, 2005 at 17:29:

    *sigh* yes, you are missing something: the fact that that would clearly work straight away, without any potential for building anything, thus with no potential for stuff to break and create emergencies.

    Actually, that is one option under consideration, but we already have a shed roof, and it’s only yay-high, so were thinking about groovy ways to get a bit more height on the water.

leave a reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

 

April 2005
S M T W T F S
« Mar   May »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Archives

Meta